We used:
AMD Athlon64 FX-62
OCZ DDR2 PC2-6400 ATI CrossFire Certified
Sapphire PURE Crossfire 3200 PC-AM2RD580 Motherboard
Sapphire PURE Innovation HDMI PI-AM2RS690MHD Motherboard
Sapphire X1950PRO Dual 1024MB
Leadtek 8800GTS 640MB
OCZ GameXStream Power Supply 700W (NVIDIA SLI-Ready)
Zalman Ultra Quiet CPU Cooler CNPS9700 LED
Composite Figures 3Dmark 03 |
3DMark 03 |
Game2 |
Game3 |
Game3 |
Sapphire X1950PRO Dual PI-AM2RS690MHD XP |
26499 |
222.7 |
164.9 |
177.0 |
Leadtek 8800GTS _______PI-AM2RS690MHD XP |
23893 |
193.5 |
152.1 |
157.1 |
Sapphire X1950PRO Dual PC-AM2RD580 Vista |
25882 |
220.0 |
162.5 |
166.0 |
Leadtek 8800GTS _______PC-AM2RD580 Vista |
26012 |
232.3 |
173.0 |
150.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Composite Figures 3Dmark 03 |
Single Texturinng |
Multi Textur. |
Pixel Shader 2.0 |
Vertex Shader |
Sapphire X1950PRO Dual PI-AM2RS690MHD XP |
7568.9 |
13420.8 |
306.7 |
105.9 |
Leadtek 8800GTS _______PI-AM2RS690MHD XP |
5096.6 |
11864.6 |
421.1 |
96.4 |
Sapphire X1950PRO Dual PC-AM2RD580 Vista |
7359.8 |
13200.4 |
304.9 |
99.3 |
Leadtek 8800GTS _______PC-AM2RD580 Vista |
5055.3 |
11675.8 |
414.7 |
93.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Composite Figures 3Dmark 05 |
3DMark 05 |
Game1 |
Game2 |
Game2 |
Sapphire X1950PRO Dual PI-AM2RS690MHD XP |
14756 |
53.6 |
42.9 |
89.7 |
Leadtek 8800GTS _______PI-AM2RS690MHD XP |
14027 |
53.5 |
42.0 |
78.7 |
Sapphire X1950PRO Dual PC-AM2RD580 Vista |
14377 |
54.8 |
41.9 |
82.7 |
Leadtek 8800GTS _______PC-AM2RD580 Vista |
13852 |
54.9 |
40.6 |
76.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Composite Figures 3Dmark 05 |
Single Texturinng |
Multi Textur. |
Pixel Shader |
VS/VS |
Sapphire X1950PRO Dual PI-AM2RS690MHD XP |
7930.2 |
13757.5 |
644.6 |
134.9/110.9 |
Leadtek 8800GTS _______PI-AM2RS690MHD XP |
5143.8 |
11876.2 |
387.4 |
124.1/96.7 |
Sapphire X1950PRO Dual PC-AM2RD580 Vista |
8265.4 |
13268.4 |
631.2 |
116.6/104.3 |
Leadtek 8800GTS _______PC-AM2RD580 Vista |
5085.9 |
11867.3 |
382.9 |
122.7/111.4 |
In 3Dmark03 Sapphire X1950 PRO DUAL is about 2500 points faster than the 8800 GTS. In Vista the Leadtek 8800 GTS is a bit faster. Unexpected is that Leadtek 8800 GTS is about 2000 points faster in Vista than under XP. You can clearly see that the Sapphire card scores much more in single and multi texturing, up to 50 per cent more than the 8800 GTS card, but in pixel shader 2.0 Nvidia is better.
The Sapphire Duo card is again better in 3Dmark05 by about 700 points. In Vista the 8800 GTS loses out by some 500 points. Once again you can see a big increase in single texturing performanace and that multi texturing is also a bit faster than the Nvidia card. We see some very interesting scores in pixel shader test where the Sapphire X1950 PRO DUAL scores much better than in the 3DMark03 pixel shader 2.0 test.
Composite Figures 3Dmark 06 |
3DMark 06 |
|
|
|
Sapphire X1950PRO Dual PI-AM2RS690MHD XP |
8609 |
|
|
|
Leadtek 8800GTS _______PI-AM2RS690MHD XP |
8338 |
|
|
|
Sapphire X1950PRO Dual PC-AM2RD580 Vista |
8018 |
|
|
|
Leadtek 8800GTS _______PC-AM2RD580 Vista |
8223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SM2.0 Test |
Score |
GT1 |
GT2 |
|
Sapphire X1950PRO Dual PI-AM2RS690MHD XP |
3631 |
28.133 |
« Prev Next
|